Dialogues – Biblical Quranism – Quran and Other Scriptures Pt 4 (who was given at-tauraat and al-injeel?)

In the previous part of this series, we saw that it is impossible to prove that the Quranic personality *musa* was connected to the Quranic word at-tauraat(usually translated as the Torah). In this part, we will now look at the only personality in Quran related to at-tauraat. Please look at Quran 3/48:

and He teaches him al-kitaab and al-hikmah and at-tauraat and al-injeel.

Who is this personality? It is none other than *isa* the son of *maryam*. It is interesting to note that *isa* is given 4 things in 3/48, not just at-tauraat and al-injeel. He is also given al-kitaab and al-hikmah. Al-kitaab and al-hikmah are usually translated as ‘the book and the wisdom’.

If we look for other occurences of this phrase, we will find them connected to the role of the messengers:

Our Lord, and send among them a messenger from themselves who will recite to them Your verses and teach them the Book and wisdom and purify them. Indeed, You are the Exalted in Might, the Wise.” (2/129)

Just as We have sent among you a messenger from yourselves reciting to you Our verses and purifying you and teaching you the Book and wisdom and teaching you that which you did not know.  (2/151)

Certainly did Allah confer [great] favor upon the believers when He sent among them a Messenger from themselves, reciting to them His verses and purifying them and teaching them the Book and wisdom, although they had been before in manifest error. (3/164)

It is He who has sent among the unlettered a Messenger from themselves reciting to them His verses and purifying them and teaching them the Book and wisdom – although they were before in clear error – (62/2)

There are four verses altogether which tell us that the rasool or messenger teaches al-kitab wal-hikmah (translated a. It is reasonable to assume that *isa*, being a messenger himself, teaches the very same al-kitab wal-hikmah as mentioned in 3/48

The question now would be this: if 2/129, 2/151, 3/164 and 62/2 do not mention any other talim/teaching, then why do we assume that at-tauraat and al-injeel taught to *isa* are books at all?

Furthermore, if ‘al-kitab’ is already ‘the book’ and all nabis/prophets brought ‘the book with truth’ (2/213), at-tauraat and al-injeel cannot be books as well. It is inconcievable that *isa* brought four books.

It would be better for us to look through Quran itself to find the best understanding of at-tauraat and injeel. In the next part of this series, we will be analysing those relevant verses.

About Farouk A. Peru

I am a human being in the world, blogging my existence. My thought systems may be found in my website: www.farouk.name
This entry was posted in Biblical Quranism, Dialogues and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s