Using Modern Language to Decode Quran

I was first piqued to this idea of modern language and Quranic discourse when a scholar said to me ‘The Quran is a 7th century text. It does not have modern political concepts and so is unsuitable for human use’. This was a disturbing thought at first but after giving it some thought, I did ask come up with the following counter-question: Why should Quran have such concepts?

Quran purports itself to be a detailing of every thing (12/111) which I interpret to mean it captures the essence of being human. This essence is immutable and thus not subject to space and time. This is how Quran is above human chronology. No matter where one is or in whatever period of time, Quran would be relevant to his human essence.

So why does Quran lack these ‘modern political concepts’? Perhaps concepts like ‘state’ (dawlah), ‘civil society’ (mujtama’ madani) and ‘citizenship’ (muwataniya). None of these exist in Quran yet are part of the vocabulary of modern political language. As I see it, there are two conclusions to make here. One, that Quran has failed in its purpose or two – these concepts are not essential to human being.

Yes Quran does not have these terms but it does have concepts which are approximations to the above. For example, its concept of ‘ummah’. ‘Ummah’ concepts from the word ‘umm’ which suggests a parent like act of a community over its members. Moreover, the ummah seems to be the natural formations in the animal kingdom as well (6/38) which gives us an unlimited source of information as to what the concept refers.

Perhaps then the concept subsumes all these of the above, state, civil society and citizenship. Perhaps Quran purports a concept which transcends all three. It wishes to see a society in which state, civil society and citizenship are one. Certainly, this possibility is increased by Quran’s assertion that essence of humankind is one ummah and that our tendency for mutual exploitation undermines that unity (2/213).

It is also interesting that the messengers who are the agents of truth and justice are said to be a single ummah and that Allah is their lord (21/92). This shows that the system of truth feeds into the concept of ummah. However, it should also be noted that firaun (the leader of the system of oppression) does not use this term. Rather, he breaks up his people into factions, keeping them against one another (28/4). Perhaps the concepts of state, civil society and citizenship fits more into this mould and it does with the concept of ummah?

It is not within the scope of this essay to provide substantial answers to the above question. Rather it is meant to be an example about how terms emerging in the modern language may find their reality of factuality in Quran yet not its wording. Perhaps Quran does not use these words because it has a more succinct way or even more accurate way of framing the reality of human being. The key is to find similar ideas then elicit Quran’s worldview of those ideas through its contexts.

Advertisements

About Farouk A. Peru

I am a human being in the world, blogging my existence. My thought systems may be found in my website: www.farouk.name
This entry was posted in Essays, Theory and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Using Modern Language to Decode Quran

  1. lambdamoses says:

    First, the scholar missed a point that what’s modern is not necessarily true, and I’ve heard another scholar saying that we’ve never been modern since it’s simply impossible to keep what modernists wish to be separate to be separate and modernists are simply creating an illusion of separation. Also, it’s kind of like the Quran did not mention DNA, gene, and etc. Its purpose is not to tell us every detail of nature, but it codes for the law from which we can derive the spirit of science, such as truthfulness and combination of theory and experiments. There’s no such an idea of “science,” and “science” is not a very old idea, but “science” forms a part of a larger idea in the Quran. BTW, I don’t know why people, no matter working in what field, tend to care about politics, wheras health care is also very pertinent to our everyday life, but not that many people follow medical news or talk about it and they prefer pseudoscientific tips instead.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s